This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch] mt_allocator: spare mem & fix alignment problems

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
To: Loren James Rittle <rittle at latour dot rsch dot comm dot mot dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:00:45 -0600
Subject: Re: [Patch] mt_allocator: spare mem & fix alignment problems
Organization: Red Hat / Chicago
References: <40630DF2.7040507@suse.de><20040325112605.0021293e.bkoz@nabi.net><406446A1.7010600@suse.de><200403292019.i2TKJF22021085@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com>

>Here is the nicest thing I can say: rope is one of those cool things
>that was never standardized.  The implementation we have was designed
>to work best with GC.  That is fine but we don't do GC in the library
>implementation.

Yes, this seems to be in-line with the consensus thinking on this issue.
Therefore, I'll not be trying to deprecate rope.

-benjamin

References:
- [Patch] mt_allocator: spare mem & fix alignment problems
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] mt_allocator: spare mem & fix alignment problems
  - From: B. Kosnik
- Re: [Patch] mt_allocator: spare mem & fix alignment problems
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] mt_allocator: spare mem & fix alignment problems
  - From: Loren James Rittle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]