This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: vector/deque/list derived allocator issue

From: "Gawain Bolton" <gp dot bolton at computer dot org>
To: "B. Kosnik" <bkoz at nabi dot net>,"Dhruv Matani" <dhruvbird at HotPOP dot com>
Cc: <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 22:14:25 +0100
Subject: Re: vector/deque/list derived allocator issue
References: <20040324234045.7c1a4e7e.bkoz@nabi.net><1080210792.1410.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20040325122428.14b06808.bkoz@nabi.net>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "B. Kosnik" <bkoz@nabi.net>
To: "Dhruv Matani" <dhruvbird@HotPOP.com>
Cc: <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>; <gp.bolton@computer.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 7:24 PM
Subject: Re: vector/deque/list derived allocator issue


[snip]
> This bit failed testing. I've changed it to the following patch, which
> passes with no regressions.
>
> Thoughts? Gawain, you commented on this patch before. Does this iteration
satisfy?

My comments given in the following message still stand:
    http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2004-02/msg00254.html

You can apply Dhruv's patch and I can send in a patch making the changes I
suggest afterwards if you like.

Cheers,

Gawain

References:
- vector/deque/list derived allocator issue
  - From: B. Kosnik
- Re: vector/deque/list derived allocator issue
  - From: Dhruv Matani
- Re: vector/deque/list derived allocator issue
  - From: B. Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]