This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: locking problem with mips atomicity
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 03:01:33PM -0800, Michael Eager wrote:
> Phil Edwards wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 05:01:33PM -0800, Michael Eager wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Why the in-out constraint on __mem? You don't modify %2.
> > >
> > > OK, changed it to only input.
> >
> > Since it seems to be the latest, this is the version I'll check in to the
> > trunk. There isn't an open regression PR for this (is there?), so it'll
> > be queued for 3.4.1.
>
> It's not a regression. No PR. I can create one if you want.
If there's no regression, then I (personally) wouldn't bother, but one of
the bugmasters may request otherwise.
If I don't remember to apply it once 3.4 is out, please remind me.
I'm trying to keep all the queued-up patches in one place, but some may
slip through.
I've just applied the patch to the trunk.
--
Behind everything some further thing is found, forever; thus the tree behind
the bird, stone beneath soil, the sun behind Urth. Behind our efforts, let
there be found our efforts.
- Ascian saying, as related by Loyal to the Group of Seventeen