This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] moneypunct::frac_digits < 0 ?!?

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Nathan Myers <ncm at cantrip dot org>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 15:49:16 +0100
Subject: Re: [RFC] moneypunct::frac_digits < 0 ?!?
References: <4045ED95.50204@suse.de>

Paolo Carlini wrote:

So, what shall we do? Consistency with other sections of the
standard (i.e., num_put::do_put for negative precision) and Note
244 seem to suggest that we should use by "default" the value 2...


... another possibility (22.2.6.3, p3) is that a negative frac_digits()
should lead to the very same behavior of frac_digits() == 0.

Probably, I like this interpretation better.

Paolo.

References:
- [RFC] moneypunct::frac_digits < 0 ?!?
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]