This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Which autoconf for libstdc++

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
Cc: phil at jaj dot com, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 19 Dec 2003 16:49:06 -0700
Subject: Re: Which autoconf for libstdc++
References: <200312182037.VAA07831@faui1d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de><20031218205410.GA12511@disaster.jaj.com><87zndpk2w0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com><20031218214848.0b8b1c32.bkoz@redhat.com>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "benjamin" == Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:

benjamin> Current versions of these tools are
benjamin> autoconf-2.59
benjamin> automake-1.8

benjamin> If the java and c++ folks agree to this then I guess the
benjamin> next step would be to post a RFC on the gcc list, and then
benjamin> set AC_PREREQ?

This all sounds good to me.  Let's do it.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which autoconf for libstdc++
  - From: Phil Edwards

References:
- Which autoconf for libstdc++
  - From: Ulrich Weigand
- Re: Which autoconf for libstdc++
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: Which autoconf for libstdc++
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Which autoconf for libstdc++
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]