This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [v3] 9371/9546/10093/10095
- From: Andreas Tobler <toa at pop dot agri dot ch>
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 06:28:42 +0100
- Subject: Re: [v3] 9371/9546/10093/10095
- References: <20031127021238.2cec7fa7.bkoz@redhat.com>
Hi Benjamin,
I see this on darwin7.0.0: (regress too)
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 2328
# of unexpected failures 83
# of expected failures 11
In file included from
/Volumes/xufs/gcc-cvs-dylib/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/basic_filebuf/sbumpc/char/1-in.cc:25:^M/Volumes/xufs/gcc-cvs-dylib/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/testsuite_io.h:
In constructor
`__gnu_test::fail_streambuf::fail_streambuf()':^M/Volumes/xufs/gcc-cvs-dylib/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/testsuite_io.h:109:
warning: sorry: semantics of inline function static data `char p[2]' are
wrong (you'll wind up with multiple
copies)^M/Volumes/xufs/gcc-cvs-dylib/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/testsuite_io.h:109:
warning: you can work around this by removing the initializer^M
FAIL: 27_io/basic_filebuf/sbumpc/char/1-in.cc (test for excess errors)
Any quick idea what I could try?
Thanks,
Andreas