This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: PATCH: __cxa_vec_delete* Changes
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- To: Jonathan Wakely <cow at compsoc dot man dot ac dot uk>
- Cc: oldham at codesourcery dot com, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 11:33:58 -0600
- Subject: Re: PATCH: __cxa_vec_delete* Changes
- Organization: Red Hat / Chicago
- References: <3FA8819D.30109@codesourcery.com><20031107171615.GA32872@compsoc.man.ac.uk>
>> !
>> ! base = static_cast <char *> (array_address);
>> ! size = 0;
>>
>> if (padding_size)
>> {
>
>Is there an ABI reason to declare the variables (uninitialised) at the
>top of the function, rather than after the return statement?
>C++STYLE says to declare variables where first used (and to write
>"char* s" not "char *s" but that was wrong already)
As far as I'm concerned, patches to make libsupc++ conform to C++STYLE
are waaaaaaay past due and pre-approved.
-benjamin