This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [PATCH] fix doc references to GLIBCPP_FORCE_NEW
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 01:25:46AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 04:38:10PM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote:
>
> > > * docs/html/ext/howto/guide.html (GLIBCXX_FORCE_NEW): Fix
> > > references to non-existent GLIBCPP_FORCE_NEW to be
> > > GLIBCXX_FORCE_NEW
> >
> > However, this would give the wrong impression that the variable has
> > always been named with the GLIBCXX form. Could you add a sentence in
> > there pointing out the name change?
>
> I'm afraid I don't know what release introduced the name change. If
> someone can tell me that, I can do a new patch.
IIRC, 3.3 introduced the variable using the PP form, 3.4+ will have the
renamed form.
> Khendon's Law:
> If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
Nice!
--
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
- Brian W. Kernighan