This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [comp.lang.c++] Performance: multiple inheritance vs. single inheritance

From: "Alex Vinokur" <alexvn at connect dot to>
To: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 06:45:02 +0300
Subject: Re: [comp.lang.c++] Performance: multiple inheritance vs. single inheritance
References: <bgoppv$b53$1@main.gmane.org> <20030805183703.GB32665@disaster.jaj.com>

"Phil Edwards" <phil@jaj.com> wrote in message 20030805183703.GB32665@disaster.jaj.com">news:20030805183703.GB32665@disaster.jaj.com...
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 08:31:30PM +0300, Alex Vinokur wrote:
> >
> > "Graham Banks" <grahambanksRemoveIfYouAreNotASpamBot@sol-digi.com> wrote in message news:bg8hfh$c47$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...
> > > Does using multiple inheritance introduce any more performance overhead than
> > > single inheritance?
> > >
> > >
> >
> >         Multiple inheritance vs. single inheritance
> >  ===========================================
>
>
> Um, that's great, guys, but it has nothing to do with the development
> of libstdc++-v3.  :-)  Please keep the discussion on Usenet, not this list.
>

OK.
Thanks.

[snip]


   ==========================================
   Alex Vinokur
     mailto:alexvn@connect.to
     http://sourceforge.net/users/alexvn
     http://www.simtel.net/search.php?action=search&authorName=Alex+Vinokur
   ==========================================

References:
- [comp.lang.c++] Performance: multiple inheritance vs. single inheritance
  - From: Alex Vinokur
- Re: [comp.lang.c++] Performance: multiple inheritance vs. single inheritance
  - From: Phil Edwards

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]