Re: [libstdc++] Port-specific symbol exports, porting notes

[Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>]

>Actually, I might try and use it for the instantiations that seem to be
>needed on mips-elf, since it looks like no other platform needs those.

I think these are a port-specific mistake.

>It wasn't the semicolon thing, even though that continues to trip us up.
>It's the new functionality.  But we should be able to go with 2.older anyhow,
>as long as the per-port functionality is not in actual use.  (I'll put
>the semicolons back but leave the marker hook for additional symbols.)

Okay.

>There may be reasons to require something higher than 2.12 anyhow.  Did
>you see Andrew's note about the assembler bug?

No, what's that? Hasn't this mostly shaken itself out now?

-benjamin