This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [libstdc++] Port-specific symbol exports, porting notes

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 18:29:23 -0400
Subject: Re: [libstdc++] Port-specific symbol exports, porting notes

On Sunday, Jul 6, 2003, at 18:08 US/Eastern, Phil Edwards wrote:

On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 11:12:06PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Phil Edwards wrote:

So I submit that nearly all the folks mixing development-stage compilers with older released binutils will be us.
...and thousands of users of the BSD ports collections, and many users
who need to use non-released GCC for various reasons, and so on.
If we can work with vendor tools (as, ld) we really should also support older versions of the GNU tools.
I have no problem doing this, that's why I asked for suggestions. The ld bug that Andrew pointed out may influence this.

It is not a ld bug but an as bug, not that should not matter because they usually come together.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

References:
- Re: [libstdc++] Port-specific symbol exports, porting notes
  - From: Phil Edwards

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]