This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [Patch] Nathan's improvements to basic_string
- From: Loren James Rittle <rittle at latour dot rsch dot comm dot mot dot com>
- To: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: ncm at cantrip dot org
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 17:50:06 -0500 (CDT)
- Subject: Re: [Patch] Nathan's improvements to basic_string
- Organization: Networks and Infrastructure Lab (IL02/2240), Motorola Labs
- References: <3EE8CDF1.6070103@unitus.it>
In article <20030613215934.GC8942@tofu.dreamhost.com> you write:
> The first interesting result is that at -O1 it says
>
> gnu/include/c++/3.4/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bits/atomicity.h: In
> function `int main()':
> /amd/ncm/gnu/include/c++/3.4/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bits/atomicity.h:43:
> error: inconsistent
> operand constraints in an `asm'
That's because the asm constraints [in config/cpu/i486/atomicity.h]
are now likely wrong. They likely became wrong when someone installed
the patch to allow either {0,1} or {1,0} ordering...
Since I neither generated nor approved that patch (and barely
understand the stuff myself to speak authoritatively on the matter),
I'm going to remain silent now. ;-)
Regards,
Loren