This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: + unbuffered bits (Re: [Patch] Fix libstdc++/9761)

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 10:46:28 -0500
Subject: Re: + unbuffered bits (Re: [Patch] Fix libstdc++/9761)
References: <3EDA5CF0.9020207@unitus.it><3EDB0994.2060903@unitus.it><20030602095359.2c02f6fa.bkoz@redhat.com><3EDB696E.90900@unitus.it>

>I would appreciate some additional explanations.

Paolo, I'm sorry. I should never do patch review pre-coffee on a Monday.
I see now what you are doing. This looks fine.

Do you really need __testpb, since it's really just _M_pback_init?

-benjamin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: + unbuffered bits (Re: [Patch] Fix libstdc++/9761)
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- [Patch] Fix libstdc++/9761
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- + unbuffered bits (Re: [Patch] Fix libstdc++/9761)
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: + unbuffered bits (Re: [Patch] Fix libstdc++/9761)
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: + unbuffered bits (Re: [Patch] Fix libstdc++/9761)
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]