This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: return-value policy question
firstname.lastname@example.org (Kai Henningsen) writes:
| email@example.com (Gabriel Dos Reis) wrote on 29.04.03 in <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
| > Nathan Myers <email@example.com> writes:
| > | On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 04:26:12PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > | > [abuse]
| > |
| > | Gaby, your remarks did not address _any_ of the questions asked.
| > I did address them by questioning the premisses you made.
| Well, it sounded to me like you were questioning straw men you made up,
For example, these are Nathan's words:
It is indisputable, by Occam's Razor, that the latter is simpler:
it involves fewer elements.
Not mine. He made the assumptions that "fewer elements" (which elements?)
| That mail sure read like a completely unprovoked attack.
Do you think that mails like this one you sent are not unprovoked attack?