Re: PATCH: libstdc++/7680 (related to RFC posted last week)

[Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>]

Loren James Rittle <rittle at latour dot rsch dot comm dot mot dot com> writes:

| In article <m3y92franv dot fsf at uniton dot integrable-solutions dot net>,
| Gabriel Dos Reis<gdr at integrable-solutions dot net> writes:
| 
| > Loren James Rittle <rittle at latour dot rsch dot comm dot mot dot com> writes:
| > | + // ...and in the darkness bind them...
| > | + namespace __gnu_cxx_private
| 
| >   Why is __gnu_cxx isn't sufficient?
| 
| > I'm trying to get the whole picture.
| 
| Based on this and Benjamin's input, I will make it a nested namespace
| inside __gnu_cxx .  I was independently thinking about the issue
| raised by Phil where stuff directly inside __gnu_cxx is not really
| private to our users.
| 
| Is __gnu_cxx::__c99_binding OK?

Fine with me.  If you don't hear any different opinion within 24 hours,
please go ahead and check the patch in.

Thanks,

-- Gaby