This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: libstdc++/9828: Regression: Segmentation fault in num_put::put
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Cc: peturr02 at ru dot is, jlquinn at optonline dot net, paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 10:17:06 -0600
- Subject: Re: libstdc++/9828: Regression: Segmentation fault in num_put::put
- References: <07D05A69A3D0C14FAEA60C3ACE8E5564028F5564@nike.hir.is><20030403101313.3e6a6fe3.bkoz@redhat.com>
>Yep. This is what I was talking about when this first went in, abit very
>vaguely. If you could do something like has_cache/use_cache as analogues
>to has_facet/has_cache I think we'll be better off.
Ugh. I mean: has_cache/use_cache like has_facet/use_facet! I didn't get
this right the first time I posted it.
Also, this will make the zero-allocation bits easier to do. (We need a
way to do zero allocation for both the standard streams, and for the
future, when persistent streams are done.)
best,
benjamin