This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [Patch] Fix libstdc++/10097
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 22:47:45 -0600
- Subject: Re: [Patch] Fix libstdc++/10097
- References: <3E745455.email@example.com>
Yo Paolo, this looks good. Please make the created temporary files in
the testsuite start with tmp_*: see my last check in. Other than that, cool.
>Tested x86-linux. If approved, seems good for 3.3 too.
>In general, my plans are as follows:
> 1- Have in fixes for 9533 and 10097: proposals already
I'll get to the showmany one tomorrow.
> 2- Have in Pétur's patches for 9964, 9581/9870: both
> ok with me!
> 3- Return to 9701 to fix the second part: seems easy in
> the light of some obervations from Nathan.
> 4- Finally return to 9423/9024, and then 9875/9178.
I would really like to investigate the idea of completely separate
unbuffered/buffered filebuf classes for narrow and wide input. Petur
proposed a wide one, but I think it's the way to go for both. I'll work
on doing this, or at least a proof of concept, or getting to the point
where I can explain it.
I really need to fix up the 27 testsuites. Ugh. If I do that, would you
please consider doing 21 in parallel? Ugh. If we both work on it I bet
we could get both done in the next week. Would you please, please
consider doing this important work with me this week instead? I really
need help with this, and you are the 21_strings maintainer. Or, we could
flip for it and the one who loose could do 27.