This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: per-port symbol exports (was Re: libstdc++ related boostrapfailure)

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
To: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 11:23:07 -0600
Subject: Re: per-port symbol exports (was Re: libstdc++ related boostrapfailure)
References: <Pine.BSF.4.51.0302131144330.83957@naos.dbai.tuwien.ac.at><200302140317.h1E3H4eH030020@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com><20030214171730.GA25989@disaster.jaj.com><20030214213307.GA30007@disaster.jaj.com><20030214164043.28607892.bkoz@redhat.com><20030214225419.GA32436@disaster.jaj.com>

>This turns out to be a trivial fix to ld; patch pending.

Excellent.

I feel per-port symbol exports are inevitable, just something to be
delayed as long as possible.

Also, could you sketch to me how you think they could be implemented,
given the pending ld patch? I'm now curious (I remember this being
constraining to me a while back.)

-benjamin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: per-port symbol exports (was Re: libstdc++ related boostrap failure)
  - From: Phil Edwards

References:
- libstdc++ related boostrap failure
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: libstdc++ related boostrap failure
  - From: Loren James Rittle
- Re: libstdc++ related boostrap failure
  - From: Phil Edwards
- per-port symbol exports (was Re: libstdc++ related boostrap failure)
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: per-port symbol exports (was Re: libstdc++ related boostrapfailure)
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: per-port symbol exports (was Re: libstdc++ related boostrap failure)
  - From: Phil Edwards

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]