This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults

From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, Andi Kleen <ak at suse dot de>,gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 22:03:21 +0000
Subject: Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults
References: <20030127102539.5e4ce5f6.bkoz@redhat.com> <20030127164753.GA5986@wotan.suse.de> <873cnebkhr.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <20030127170014.GA14134@wotan.suse.de> <20030127123451.30d7e3e9.bkoz@redhat.com> <20030127184913.GA14162@wotan.suse.de> <20030127130129.1c89cdf6.bkoz@redhat.com> <87smve9wz5.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>

Zack Weinberg wrote:-

> > Why aren't the defaults sane???
> 
> I imagine they were sane for when they were introduced, and have never
> been reexamined since?

Let's not get carried away, though, and compare post-GC-fudge
performance to pre-GC-fudge performance and claim we're doing better.

Neil.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults
  - From: Matt Austern

References:
- Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults
  - From: Andi Kleen
- Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]