This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: bumping libstdc++ version number on 3.3 branch and HEAD?

From: Matthias Klose <doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de>
To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 01:28:00 +0100
Subject: Re: bumping libstdc++ version number on 3.3 branch and HEAD?
References: <15891.12792.770868.213187@gargle.gargle.HOWL><20030107140526.2c9186bc.bkoz@redhat.com>

Benjamin Kosnik writes:
> 
> >Are there no changes in libstdc++, that would rectify bumping the
> >version number to version 6:0:0?
> 
> I think waiting until GXX_ABI gets bumped to 103 before changing the
> libstdc++.so is a good idea. I anticipate this happening for the 3.4
> release, but don't know what's going on.

a related issue (gcc 3.3 branch): -fabi-version doesn't have an effect
on the definition of __GXX_ABI_VERSION.

$ /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ -fabi-version=1 -E -dM - < /dev/null | fgrep GXX
cc1: warning: "-fabi-version=" is valid for C++ but not for C/ObjC
#define __GXX_ABI_VERSION 102

$ /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ -fabi-version=0 -E -dM - < /dev/null | fgrep GXX
cc1: warning: "-fabi-version=" is valid for C++ but not for C/ObjC
#define __GXX_ABI_VERSION 102

References:
- bumping libstdc++ version number on 3.3 branch and HEAD?
  - From: Matthias Klose
- Re: bumping libstdc++ version number on 3.3 branch and HEAD?
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]