This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: basic-improvements merge status
> Richard Henderson <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> | > Since it doesn't, because there no library support with
> | > it), it is *wrong* to assume it is operating in C99 mode.
> | On the other hand, if you don't have a c99-compliant library,
> | I wonder if you should be using -std=c99 at all.
> No body was using -std=c99 when building libstdc++-v3.
I never claimed that the current behaviour is correct.
> -- Gaby