This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: basic-improvements merge status
Jan Hubicka <email@example.com> writes:
| > On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 02:44 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
| > >On C99 and C++ it is always valid as runtime is required to have it
| > >(and
| > >thats why libstdc++ does it).
| > According to the C99 standard, this is right, but GCC does not control
| > the
| > runtime libraries. What should the behavior of -std=c99 be, when
| > generating code
| > for a target with non-C99-conformant libraries?
| I don't know. It is interesting combination at least (like C without
| It would be best to push these into libgcc when runtime does not
| overwrite these. Is that doable?
Does that mean that GCC will also provide a C library?