This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: basic-improvements merge status


> >OK, I will disable the transfromation for the moment.
> 
> Thanks; that's fine.
> 
> >>how to do the configury bits.  (One possibility is explicitly flags in
> >>the tm.h file.)
> >
> >What do you think is the correct way to handle it?
> 
> I'm not sure; I'm not a configury expert.  For a native build, I'd think
> we could use autoconf; for a cross-build, that's a little tougher -- but
> I'd think we could still do it.
> 
> The simplest approach would be something like TARGET_MEM_FUNCTIONS.

OK, I will create updated patch with TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS macro and set
it via linux.h file.  Does this sound sane?
In next iteration we may add autoconf bits for this, but I would like to
hear opinion from someone more familiar with it than I do first.

Honza
> 
> -- 
> Mark Mitchell                mark@codesourcery.com
> CodeSourcery, LLC            http://www.codesourcery.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]