This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: basic-improvements merge status
> Your patch to libmath/Makefile.am is fine, but your ChangeLog entry
> should say libmath/Makefile.am, not Makefile.am.
> >I am not configure expert, but can I detect the runtime library
> >properties in it? (when we are building without glibc, we need to
> >rebuild anyway at least on Linux bootstrap, so this should be possible)
> >Other way would be to use target macro. Something like
> >TARGET_C99_RUNTIME. Ideal would be to push these functions into libgcc,
> >but I am not quite sure how this can be done (ie so they will be
> >overwriten by runtime).
> >What sounds sane?
> GLIBCPPP_USE_C99. This is on by default for gnu/linux.
Uh yes, I need something like that available in gcc itself and not
locked to GLIBC only...
> Keep in mind that tests for C99, and decisions on what to enable or
> partially enable WRT C99 support in the C++ runtime is a continuing area
> of controversy, especially with respect to wide character support.
In case we do have sinf and friends always defined by C++ runtime, this
is not problem as the names are reserved anyway. I guess.