This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: patches to move to gcc-3_2-branch
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, "rittle at labs dot mot dot com" <rittle at labs dot mot dot com>
- Cc: "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 08:16:48 -0800
- Subject: Re: patches to move to gcc-3_2-branch
--On Wednesday, December 04, 2002 11:20:50 PM -0600 Benjamin Kosnik
Upon looking at it closely, it is really hard for me to consider this
a regression. User's use of __USE_MALLOC has always been problematic
This is a regression against 2.95 era compilers (v2), where __USE_MALLOC
was possible. I thought these still counted, or do all regressions have
to be against 3.x series compilers? Perhaps I'm just confused.
You're correct; regressions against 2.95 are still regressions.
If you don't feel you can merge the patch safely, that would be a reason
not to do it; otherwise, you should go ahead and do it.
Mark Mitchell firstname.lastname@example.org
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com