stable STL implementation

[Vijay Patil <vpatil at knightsindia dot co dot in>]

hello all
           which is the most stable implementation of STL?? , is it Dinkum,
SGI, STLport, Roguewave, or somethnig else

i am working on platform independent product, we have used STL every where, 
currently we support Win2000(VC++) , Linux(gcc2.95.3), Solaris(gcc2.95.3) ,
but some times i get very strange behavior of STL on Win2000, and same thing
works fine on Linux and Solaris

thanks
Vijay

-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Adams [mailto:phil_adams@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 9:16 AM
To: Vijay Patil
Cc: 'libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org'
Subject: Re: STL::list::clear , erase help



If your list was of type list<CKMaskApp>, then your destructors would be
called.   The problem is that your list is a list of pointers, not a list of
objects... 

Phil Adams
WebSphere Development
IBM Austin, TX
phil_adams@us.ibm.com
(512) 838-6702 (tie 678)



Vijay Patil <vpatil@knightsindia.co.in> 
11/29/2002 04:40 AM 
        
        To:        "'libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org'" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org> 
        cc:         
        Subject:        STL::list::clear , erase  help 




Hello
                i have a list pointers  defined like shown below

list<CKMaskApp*> m_MaskAppList;

i have added some CKMaskApp pointers to m_MaskAppList list

if i say m_MaskAppList->clear(); , will it call the destructor of CKMaskApp
objects, i saw the MSDN documents it says that N destructors are called, but
destructors are never called, I'm working with MS VC with CL compiler on Win
NT

is it STL list bug or some think else?, 
what is the standard behavior of list::clear or erase function 

thanks
Vijay