This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Still improving! (Was: Re: [PATCH] Avoid strtok for thread safety)

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
To: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:53:22 -0600
Subject: Re: Still improving! (Was: Re: [PATCH] Avoid strtok for thread safety)
References: <3DE2BF34.5030500@unitus.it><20021126234925.A2489@cantrip.org><3DE2BF34.5030500@unitus.it><3DE40B90.5070108@unitus.it><20021127003425.B2489@cantrip.org><20021127061047.B50009@cantrip.org><3DE2BF34.5030500@unitus.it><3DE48538.2020208@unitus.it><20021127154345.A53755@cantrip.org>

>> Also, it seems to me that in the existing practice of locale implementation
>> in v3 C++ algorithms like std::copy and std::find are not used, dunno 
>> exactly why, however...

Patches accepted, as always. I consider this wholly a style issue.

-benjamin

References:
- [PATCH] Avoid strtok for thread safety
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [PATCH] Avoid strtok for thread safety
  - From: Nathan Myers
- Re: [PATCH] Avoid strtok for thread safety
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [PATCH] Avoid strtok for thread safety
  - From: Nathan Myers
- Re: [PATCH] Avoid strtok for thread safety
  - From: Nathan Myers
- Still improving! (Was: Re: [PATCH] Avoid strtok for thread safety)
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: Still improving! (Was: Re: [PATCH] Avoid strtok for thread safety)
  - From: Nathan Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]