Re: libstdc++/8230: Buggy allocator behaviour

[Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>]

>There is a simpler way.  If the containers use their Allocator as a 
>private base class instead of a member, the code is a lot cleaner.
>
>I did a treatment of this and found, although the code looked cleaner 
>to my eye, there was no significant advantage in terms of time or space 
>(at least in 3.0, when I ran the tests).  I did not measure compile 
>time differences.
>
>I could try to dig up the treatment if you want an example of what I'm 
>talking about.

Please, I'd like to see it.

-benjamin