This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: HTML docs
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 10:57:03AM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 08:45:28PM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote:
> > This is in now. I think we're actually moving towards something called
> > xhtml eventually, so there will probably need to be more changes in the
> > future by somebody who understands it.
> GCC web pages are expected to comply with XHTML 1.0 Transitional. Look
> for "Changes to the web site" in http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html,
> which tells how to validate web pages.
Ok, I can start whipping the libstdc++ pages into shape.
Currently the libstdc++ pages don't have the XHTML header added, because
they aren't in XHTML. If I start XHTML-ing them, they won't be valid unless
they _do_ have the header added, and unless all are changed at once then
some will need the auto-header and some won't.
To workaround this, should I explicitly include the XML version decl, XHTML
DTD and namespace decl until all the pages are converted, and then remove
the headers from them all at once and enable the auto-headers?
Or will the libstdc++ pages not use the MetaHTML stuff?
What's the best way to proceed here?
"The most savage controversies are about those matters as to which there
is no good evidence either way."
- Bertrand Russell