This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Regression test for thread safety?

On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 11:12:00PM -0500, Loren James Rittle wrote:
> > Something you should know if you haven't discovered it since your email:
> > turning thread support on and off is only supported by the command-line flags
> > like "-pthread" or "-mthreads" or whatever is appropriate for your platform.
> > Preprocessor symbol hacks like _NOTHREADS were never documented and aren't
> > really supported.
> GCC 3.0.X still allowed a user to define _NOTHREADS.

*smacks forehead*  The 3.0 series seems so long ago.  :-)

> Dan was asking
> about 3.0.2.  There are known SMP bugs in that release.

Yep, I remember now.  I should make better notes for the FAQ.


If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace.  We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms.  Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.            - Samuel Adams

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]