This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
gcc-3.1 cross compile ok? [was Re: gcc-3.1 + libstdc++-v3.0.97 cross compile ok?]
- From: Brad Spencer <spencer at infointeractive dot com>
- To: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 17:03:59 -0300
- Subject: gcc-3.1 cross compile ok? [was Re: gcc-3.1 + libstdc++-v3.0.97 cross compile ok?]
- References: <20020528184534.J9548@infointeractive.com> <20020529162546.A19754@disaster.basement.lan> <20020704162058.F29346@infointeractive.com>
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 04:20:58PM -0300, Brad Spencer wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:25:46PM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote:
> > On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 06:45:34PM -0300, Brad Spencer wrote:
> > > Should I be able to cross-compile (i386-sun-solaris2.6 to
> > > sparc64-sun-solaris2.8) with gcc-3.1 and libstdc++-v3.0.97?
> >
> > Is there a particular reason why you can't use the libstdc++ that ships
> > with gcc-3.1? It's more recent than the 3.0.97 snapshot...
>
> [I just got back from being away, so excuse the loss of context on
> this old thread.]
>
> Doh! I had trouble determining if gcc-3.1 (release) libstdc++-v3 was
> newer that 3.0.97 or not (the status page at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/libstdc++/status.html didn't [and still doesn't]
> help). I guess I determined wrong...
>
> Thanks..
Perhaps I spoke too soon. The original problem still shows up when
cross compiling and using the supplied libstdc++-v3. I can repost if
necessary.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Brad Spencer - spencer@infointeractive.com - "It's quite nice..."
Systems Architect | InfoInterActive Corp. | An AOL Company