This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Is mainline/3.2 still at ABI version 4?
- From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- To: bkoz at redhat dot com
- Cc: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 10:39:58 +0100
- Subject: Re: Is mainline/3.2 still at ABI version 4?
- References: <20020626122906.A22610@disaster.basement.lan><firstname.lastname@example.org><20020627170855.A25230@disaster.basement.lan><email@example.com>
>>>>> "Benjamin" == Benjamin Kosnik <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> Do you remember when/where this was? I poked around the archives just
>> now but nothing jumped out at me that hasn't already been applied. If
>> something is still pending I can ping the appropriate people.
> Here's what I was thinking of:
> Which, perusing the gcc/cp/ChangeLog, went in....
> 2002-06-14 Jason Merrill <email@example.com>
> * semantics.c (begin_for_stmt): Push the 'for' scope before
> adding the FOR_STMT.
> C++ ABI changes.
> * class.c (build_base_field): Set DECL_PACKED.
> (layout_class_type): Don't use tail padding of PODs.
> * mangle.c (write_unqualified_name): Fix template conversion op
> Yikes. Which means that libstdc++ should be bumped to 5, I think. Jason?
I suppose so.