This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Is mainline/3.2 still at ABI version 4?

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
To: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, jason at redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 13:22:32 -0700
Subject: Re: Is mainline/3.2 still at ABI version 4?
Organization: Red Hat / San Francisco
References: <20020626122906.A22610@disaster.basement.lan><20020627114745.2f232632.bkoz@redhat.com><20020627170855.A25230@disaster.basement.lan>
Reply-to: bkoz at redhat dot com

> Do you remember when/where this was?  I poked around the archives just
> now but nothing jumped out at me that hasn't already been applied.  If
> something is still pending I can ping the appropriate people.

Here's what I was thinking of:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-06/msg01275.html

Which, perusing the gcc/cp/ChangeLog, went in....

2002-06-14  Jason Merrill  <jason@redhat.com>

	* semantics.c (begin_for_stmt): Push the 'for' scope before
	adding the FOR_STMT.

	C++ ABI changes.
	* class.c (build_base_field): Set DECL_PACKED.
	(layout_class_type): Don't use tail padding of PODs.
	* mangle.c (write_unqualified_name): Fix template conversion op
	mangling.


Yikes. Which means that libstdc++ should be bumped to 5, I think. Jason?

-benjamin

References:
- Is mainline/3.2 still at ABI version 4?
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: Is mainline/3.2 still at ABI version 4?
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: Is mainline/3.2 still at ABI version 4?
  - From: Phil Edwards

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]