This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3] add c_compatibility headers, gcc bits

From: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 20:46:47 -0400
Subject: Re: [v3] add c_compatibility headers, gcc bits
References: <200206212026.g5LKQRA12641@fillmore.constant.com> <20020621204333.GA10095@codesourcery.com>

On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 01:43:33PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 01:26:27PM -0700, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> ...
> > + #endif
> > + 
> >   #endif /* _STDARG_H */
> >   
> >   #endif /* not _ANSI_STDARG_H_ */
> >   #endif /* not _STDARG_H */
> > + 
> > + 
> > Index: stddef.h
> 
> Can you please not introduce blank lines at EOF?

I've been doing this in many of the libstdc++ headers.  Nobody's complained.
What's the reasoning behind this?


Phil

-- 
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace.  We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms.  Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.            - Samuel Adams

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [v3] add c_compatibility headers, gcc bits
  - From: Zack Weinberg

References:
- [v3] add c_compatibility headers, gcc bits
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [v3] add c_compatibility headers, gcc bits
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]