This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: protected non-uglified member functions
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 07:47:27PM +0000, Nathan Myers wrote:
>
> I wonder, are there any ABI problems with uglifying them?
I started writing an email to ask that question, then I decided that
there weren't. No document exists on what we can change for v3, so it's
up to judgement calls.
These are
- protected members
- not in the standard
- not appearing in the defined symbols in a 3.1 libstdc++.so
If users see ABI breakage due to these changes, I have to believe it's
because they're doing something very invalid with their code.
Phil
--
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace. We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams