This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: protected non-uglified member functions
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 03:40:21PM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 08:58:37AM -0400, Stephen M.Webb wrote:
> > I suspect they're an artifact of prestandard implementation.
> >
> > Many of the containers and algorithms have similar specializations
> > dispatched from the public nonuglified interface. It might be a good
> > idea to come up with a consistent naming convention to make
> > understanding the code a little easier in the future. I mean, since
> > you're renaming them anyways.
>
> Yeah, between renaming and reordering and recommenting, I think that
> every function in stl_deque.h is at least briefly documented now, unless
> I missed something. I'm going back and doing that same for stl_vector.h
> now for consistency before I check them both in.
I wonder, are there any ABI problems with uglifying them?
Nathan Myers
ncm at cantrip dot org