This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [RFC] libstdc++/6720 and libstdc++/6671
- From: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
- To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>, Nathan Myers <ncm-nospam at cantrip dot org>, Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 18:01:01 -0400
- Subject: Re: [RFC] libstdc++/6720 and libstdc++/6671
- References: <20020522061245.GA1812@codesourcery.com> <m3off8yo3a.fsf@merlin.nerim.net>
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 09:33:29PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> | If the user has
> | specified -I. or -I/usr/include/g++-3/ext or whatever, they bloody
> | well meant it, for good or ill.
>
> I can't agree with that. We do give users advise to say
> -I/usr/include/g++-3/ext and that happens to break semantics.
For what it's worth: We've stopped giving out such advice, for that
reason; I changed the FAQ a couple days ago. I don't know what to do
for people already trying to use -I..../ext. It used to be "possible,
but not recommended," now it doesn't work at all.
Phil
--
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace. We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams