This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix libstdc++/6503

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
To: bkoz at nabi dot net
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, bkoz at redhat dot com
Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 17:02:44 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix libstdc++/6503
References: <3CE6446C.5030307@unitus.it> <20020518075604.5740ce24.bkoz@nabi.net>

B. Kosnik wrote:

>>Ok for trunk and branch?
>>    
>>
>
>I think so: this just adds the operators, but they are not instantiated
>in the libstdc++.so binary, are they?
>
Indeed I believe they aren't. In fact, a grep for the word "deque" finds 
nothing in libstdc++-v3/src...
But this reminds me of this sentence of yours:

> Also, at some point, perhaps a written guideline on what constitutes a
> non-ABI-breaking patch should be formulated.


I wholly agre!!!

Paolo.

References:
- [PATCH] Fix libstdc++/6503
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [PATCH] Fix libstdc++/6503
  - From: B. Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]