This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3] remove non-standard basic_filebuf members, fd, FILE filebufs

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
To: bkoz at redhat dot com
Cc: phil at jaj dot com, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 00:59:08 -0700
Subject: Re: [v3] remove non-standard basic_filebuf members, fd, FILE filebufs
Organization: Red Hat/San Francisco
References: <200204270520.g3R5KRS26509@fillmore.constant.com><20020429172051.A29881@disaster.basement.lan><20020429144111.78848eb8.bkoz@redhat.com>
Reply-to: bkoz at redhat dot com


> c_filebuf, then? I'll add a ctor that sets file permissions as well.
> I think those were the top three gripes then.

Ok, I was wrong: c_locale, c_file are used elsewhere to indicate
underlying "C" types. If anything, cfile would be better. All the
proposed variations of c + file + filebuf names kind of suck though.

I'm inclined to just keep two separate files, and the names as posted. 

The concept_checking bit is definitely in though.

I'll wait another little bit before checking this in, but it seems as if
the idea is good.

-benjamin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [v3] remove non-standard basic_filebuf members, fd, FILE filebufs
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

References:
- [v3] remove non-standard basic_filebuf members, fd, FILE filebufs
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [v3] remove non-standard basic_filebuf members, fd, FILE filebufs
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: [v3] remove non-standard basic_filebuf members, fd, FILE filebufs
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]