This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: multiple definition of `std::__default_alloc_template<(bool)1, (int)0>::allocate(unsigned)'
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 09:05:00 -0700
- Subject: Re: multiple definition of `std::__default_alloc_template<(bool)1, (int)0>::allocate(unsigned)'
- Organization: Red Hat/San Francisco
- References: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0204291436240.8992-100000@naos.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
- Reply-to: bkoz at redhat dot com
> plan.o: In function `std::__default_alloc_template<(bool)1,
> (int)0>::allocate(unsigned)': plan.o(.text+0x20b6): multiple
> definition of `std::__default_alloc_template<(bool)1,
> (int)0>::allocate(unsigned)' grounding.o(.text+0x215a): first
> defined here
No ideas, although this is the same failure as the AIX chapter 20 fail.
Perhaps this is a transient linkage bug in g++? Do you have a small set
of sources that reproduce it?
Loren's testresults postings don't show this.
-benjamin