This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [v3] remove non-standard basic_filebuf members, fd, FILE filebufs
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 12:38:48 -0700
- Subject: Re: [v3] remove non-standard basic_filebuf members, fd, FILE filebufs
- Organization: Red Hat/San Francisco
- References: <200204270520.g3R5KRS26509@fillmore.constant.com>
- Reply-to: bkoz at redhat dot com
> Thoughts?
I suppose there is no reason, at this time, to have separate classes for
fd_filebuf and file_filebuf. One class with both ctors would be
sufficient.
So, I guess the question is, would people be upset if the filebuf API
changed? Do the proposed extensions mollify those upset?
-benjamin