This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: New AIX libstdc++ testsuite regression20_util/allocator_members

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: "bkoz at redhat dot com" <bkoz at redhat dot com>
Cc: "dje at watson dot ibm dot com" <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 23:10:16 -0700
Subject: Re: New AIX libstdc++ testsuite regression20_util/allocator_members
References: <200204222227.SAA31386@makai.watson.ibm.com><6030000.1019517204@gandalf.codesourcery.com><20020422163452.38e9396d.bkoz@redhat.com>



--On Monday, April 22, 2002 04:34:52 PM -0700 Benjamin Kosnik 
<bkoz@redhat.com> wrote:

>
>> This is purely an optimization; there's no semantic reason that this
>> is necessary.
>
> Mmmmm. No. Re-read the ChangeLog, and the complete patch as posted on
> gcc-patches. Without it, static linking gets duplicate symbols.

Do you have a pointer?  I'm confused as to why we'd get duplicate
symbols -- at least on systems with weak symbols -- but I believe you...

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: New AIX libstdc++ testsuite regression 20_util/allocator_members
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

References:
- Re: New AIX libstdc++ testsuite regression 20_util/allocator_members
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: New AIX libstdc++ testsuite regression20_util/allocator_members
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: New AIX libstdc++ testsuite regression 20_util/allocator_members
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]