This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: rel_ops (was Re: GCC 3.1 Release)
- From: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot com>
- To: mark at codesourcery dot com (Mark Mitchell)
- Cc: Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM (Joe Buck),gdr at codesourcery dot com (Gabriel Dos Reis), phil at jaj dot com (Phil Edwards),gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org (gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org), bkoz at redhat dot com (bkoz at redhat dot com),libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org (libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org)
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 10:34:25 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: rel_ops (was Re: GCC 3.1 Release)
I wrote:
> > I'm not going to ask that the comment be stricken, but I'm not crazy
> > about the idea of a lot of editorial commentary in the headers.
Mark wrote:
> I agree. We don't need editorial comments about languages, operating
> systems, or other similar things in comments.
Thanks, but I wouldn't want this little dispute take away from my
gratitude to Paolo and Gaby for helping me to get this problem resolved.
I realize (rather, it has been pointed out to me) that I hadn't said
"thank you" yet. Thank you.
Having the high-priority bug fixed is so much better than not having it
fixed that a comment I don't care for in a header that few will read is a
small price to pay.
Gaby, sometimes we seem to get on one another's nerves. I'm sorry about
that, but I am grateful for all your contributions to GCC.