This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: sparcv9 vs. sparc testresults
- From: Brad Lucier <lucier at math dot purdue dot edu>
- To: bkoz at redhat dot com (Benjamin Kosnik)
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
- Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 13:17:17 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: sparcv9 vs. sparc testresults
> However... how come the sparcv9 testresults are so much better for libstdc++?
> It looks like these toolchains are configured identically.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-04/msg00316.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-04/msg00317.html
>
> Extra fails:
> FAIL: 18_support/numeric_limits.cc execution test
Assertion failed: extrema_min == limits_min, file /export/u3/lucier/programs/gcc
/gcc-3.1/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/18_support/numeric_limits.cc, line 63
FAIL: 18_support/numeric_limits.cc execution test
> FAIL: 27_io/filebuf_virtuals.cc execution test
spawn [open ...]^M
FAIL: 27_io/filebuf_virtuals.cc execution test
> FAIL: 27_io/ios_base_storage.cc execution test
spawn [open ...]^M
FAIL: 27_io/ios_base_storage.cc execution test
> FAIL: 27_io/streambuf.cc execution test
spawn [open ...]^M
FAIL: 27_io/istream_extractor_arith.cc execution test
> FAIL: 27_io/stringbuf.cc execution test
PASS: 27_io/streambuf.cc (test for excess errors)
spawn [open ...]^M
Sorry I can'be be more help.
Brad