This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: dlopen vs. libstdc++, need entry in FAQ?

From: Carlo Wood <carlo at alinoe dot com>
To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
Cc: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 04:27:43 +0200
Subject: Re: dlopen vs. libstdc++, need entry in FAQ?
References: <20020405152321.A2354@disaster.basement.lan> <Pine.SOL.3.91.1020405160118.18644A-100000@taarna.cygnus.com>

On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 04:03:31PM -0800, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> I don't know. It is what 'man dlopen' recommends though, so I thought I'd 
> stick it in. Seems to work, but I don't know if it's necessary.
> 
> -benjamin

I was confused about it too.  Actually, I have no idea
what seems to be problem.  But for what it is worth,
I use dlopen and dlsym in my C++ library and it never
failed in a weird way.  I never heard of -rdynamic either.

-- 
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>

References:
- Re: dlopen vs. libstdc++, need entry in FAQ?
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: dlopen vs. libstdc++, need entry in FAQ?
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]