This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: dlopen vs. libstdc++, need entry in FAQ?
- From: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 18:57:19 -0500
- Subject: Re: dlopen vs. libstdc++, need entry in FAQ?
- References: <200204051913.g35JDEp23419@fillmore.constant.com>
> libstdc++/6062
> libstdc++/5166
>
> Both of these work, so I don't think I see any bugs. However, it might
> be a good idea to put in some kind of documentation on how to properly
> do this.
Hmmm. In those PR's, you're recommending -rdynamic, which isn't documented
anywhere. From grepping the specs and the compiler config dirs, I can
see that it just remaps into --export-dynamic for the linker. But does
that assume/require the GNU linker?
Phil
--
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace. We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams