This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: 18/numeric_limits fail on solaris 2.8



> I did'nt notice that the tests are /doubled/ exactly for the 
> "abs-reason". Therefore no abs are needed at all... Sorry again, please 
> disregard my point about absolute values. The tests looks good.

Ok.

For this "C" program, 

#include <assert.h>

#define LDBL_MANT_DIG   113
#define LDBL_EPSILON    1.925929944387235853055977942584927319E-34L
#define LDBL_DIG        33
#define LDBL_MIN_EXP    (-16381)
#define LDBL_MIN        3.362103143112093506262677817321752603E-4932L
#define LDBL_MIN_10_EXP (-4931)
#define LDBL_MAX_EXP    (+16384)
#define LDBL_MAX        1.189731495357231765085759326628007016E+4932L

#define DEFINE_EXTREMA(T, m, M) \
  T min = m; \
  T max = M

DEFINE_EXTREMA(long double, LDBL_MIN, LDBL_MAX);

int main()
{
  long double ldmin = LDBL_MIN;
  long double ldmax = LDBL_MAX;

  assert (ldmin == min);
  assert (ldmax == max);

  return 0;
}

I get:

(gdb) p ldmin
$1 = 1.3906711615670008644313954483327525e-309
(gdb) p ldmax
$2 = nan(0xeffffffffffff)
(gdb) p min
Cannot access memory at address 0x2fdbe8
(gdb) p max
Cannot access memory at address 0x2fdbf8

... this is about as far as I want to take this, but clearly something is 
wrong.

-benjamin


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]