This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Empty vector::push_back()?

From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc at attbi dot com>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 20:35:12 -0500
Subject: Re: Empty vector::push_back()?
References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1020225111252.19462D-100000@taarna.cygnus.com> <fl8z9h3uee.fsf@riz.cmla.ens-cachan.fr>

On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 02:26:49AM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> | > I dunno :-)
> | 
> | > It isn't standard.
> | 
> | Maybe it should be removed then?
> 
> I contemplated that possibility, but I can't anticipate the amount of
> code that will break and the impact it will have. On the other hand, I
> find Phil's idea of having a hook into the diagnostic machinery
> attractive -- even though I think we should not abuse of it.  
> 
> What is your take?

Make it private, and then if you actually want to use it,
edit the header file and make it public. ;)
-- 
Craig Rodrigues        
http://www.gis.net/~craigr    
rodrigc@attbi.com

References:
- Re: Empty vector::push_back()?
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: Empty vector::push_back()?
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]