This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [libstdc++] Different version tag for libsupc++, document , config option
- From: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
- To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 23:56:10 -0500
- Subject: Re: [libstdc++] Different version tag for libsupc++, document , config option
- References: <48140000.1014572243@warlock.codesourcery.com> <flk7t2kav7.fsf@jambon.cmla.ens-cachan.fr>
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 07:12:12PM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
>
> | (There seem to be two spellings for C++ that are legal identifiers:
> | CPP, and CXX. The former is C Plus Plus, the second is plus signs
> | turned on an angle.)
I believe Digital (or Compaq or whoever they are this week) used 'cxx'
as the invocation for their compiler.
> I always tought that CXX stood for "C excess".
CXS, surely? :-)
Phil
--
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace. We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams