This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: Strange behaviour of "cin"


> I'm moving this over to the libstdc++ list: there is no 
> reason to keep it 
> on both gcc and libstdc++.

Ok. I wasn't sure if it was a problem with libstdc++ or gcc so I sent it to
both.

> > I am sorry I should have mentioned it again, I did that in 
> >my initial mail.
> > I am using gcc 3.0.3 on SCO 5.0.5.
> > Is this a peculiar behaviour on SCO or is gcc not able to 
> *fix* this header
> > correctly. I suspect the reason to be
> > the inline definitions, and there corresponding macro 
> definitions, for
> > various type identification functions present
> > in the <ctype.h> header. These are over-ridden if we use <cctype>.
> 
> You'll probably need to add SCO-specific ctype bits. See 
> libstdc++-v3/config/os/*/bits/ctype_*

1. Do you intend to incorporate the SCO specific ctype bits into libstdc++
in the near future? If not, can you give me some pointers about what it
really contains.

2. If I write this, how do I make the rest of the code aware that I have
added this there?

Arun


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]